BILL H-40

Check and share here for the latest fishing reports.
User avatar
BottomDollar
Posts: 601
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:09 pm
Species: cold water
Location: Burlington

Re: BILL H-40

Post by BottomDollar »

Great informed discussion here guys. I read the bill and misinterpreted "water sources" to mean "water bodies." And I understand wanting to keep petroleum out of drinking water supplies. A modern four stroke leaves practically no trace but the spill potential is there.

Bottom line is that this is not a universal ban on outboards as has been pointed out, but the issues raised by comparing these legislative bans in other states are absolutely worth bringing up due to mission creep in those examples.

Sorry for the misinformed alarm in my earlier posts.
User avatar
Bearcat
Posts: 374
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2015 6:31 pm
Species: cold water!
Location: RensselaerVILLE, Westport

Re: BILL H-40

Post by Bearcat »

What about other decent sized but smaller lakes like St Catherine and Bomoseen (sp)? Are outboards and other motors already banned on these waters and if not, are these lakes part of the water supply system and subject to the ban?
User avatar
keithm87
Posts: 641
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 5:28 pm
Species: Trout and Salmon
Location: Central VT

Re: BILL H-40

Post by keithm87 »

From the sounds of it this proposal would have only impacted lakes that supply municipalities. It would have been very limited in impact. But the sponsor of the bill replied to someone on another forum that this proposal was no longer under consideration. Sounds like it had been scrapped shortly after proposal in favor of a different proposal.
User avatar
fishingmachine
Posts: 860
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:48 pm
Species: salmon,Lake trout
Location: Rutland

Re: BILL H-40

Post by fishingmachine »

My purpose in starting this post was to inform people of this threat to our sport.Just because someone says this bill won't pass doesn't mean it won't come up again.They might be more clever next time.
Post Reply